Forced c-section authorized to protect woman suffering from ‘psychotic episodes’ and ‘delusional beliefs,’ judge says
The Telegraph
|
04/12/13 | Last Updated:
04/12/13 7:32 PM ET The Italian government is poised to step in and has instructed its own legal team for a possible High Court challenge to the original decision for the baby to be adopted. A judge allowed doctors to deliver a mentally ill woman’s baby by Caesarean section against her will because of fears for the safety of both mother and daughter, it emerged Wednesday. Newly released court papers reveal that Alessandra Pacchieri, 35, had already had two children by Caesarean section and doctors felt she risked serious complications if she was allowed to give birth naturally. An emergency sitting of the Court of Protection in August last year was also shown evidence that she suffered “psychotic episodes” and “delusional beliefs” and lacked the capacity to make informed decisions. Last night the medical trust caring for her broke its silence on the case to insist that it took the unusual step of applying for the baby to be delivered against Ms Pacchieri’s will because she required powerful medication that would have harmed her unborn child.
Ms Pacchieri, 35, from Tuscany, can be named for the first time after a High Court judge refused a request from Essex county council for a blanket ban on any detail that could identify her. Her child, who is in the process of being adopted, cannot be named. Court papers also point to contradiction between the account of her legal team and that of the British courts. Ms Pacchieri’s lawyer, Stefano Oliva claims that the procedure was carried out prematurely, when she was 34 weeks pregnant. But the court heard that she was just a day off her due date when the procedure took place. The case has given rise to a growing international row involving politicians in both Britain and Italy. The Italian government is poised to step in and has instructed its own legal team for a possible High Court challenge to the original decision for the baby to be adopted. Ms Pacchieri, who suffers from bipolar disorder, came to Britain in June 2012 for a training course at Stansted airport. She suffered what her legal team insist was a “panic attack” that led to her being detained under Britain’s Mental Health Act. Ten weeks later, in late August 2012, the local health authority obtained an order enabling doctors to deliver the child by Caesarean section while Essex county council began care proceedings that led to the girl being eventually put up for adoption. Despite a ruling in February in favour of adoption, Ms Pacchieri is fighting to get her child back and a final decision rests with Sir James Munby, Britain’s most senior family judge. After days of controversial wrangling, Mr Justice Mostyn, the judge who authorized the forced Caesarean, agreed to publish his judgment and a transcript of the short hearing. It shows that the crucial factor was the fear that unless the baby was delivered by Caesarean section there was a risk Ms Pacchieri would suffer a rupture. The judge remarked: “I would have thought it was in [Ms Pacchieri’s] best interests, that is, her mental health best interests, that her child should be born alive and healthy and that such result should be, if possible achieved, and such risks attendant should be avoided.” “I think, looked at from her point of view, there is also a significant mental health advantage in her unborn child not being exposed to risk during his or her birth.” Our View Welcome to the mad corrupt insane world of Child Protection where
evidence is fabricated out of a desperation to see what they want to
see, or , a pure fabrication to justify yet another statistic for the
incredibly lucrative business of adoption, foster parenting and or
supervised access.
Ontario Parents need to know that at dam near every birthing hospital
unit, nursing staff regularly witness babies snatched at birth.
Stopcas.ca Ontario Canada is has an equally notorious and even more unaccountable system of Child Protection.
It's a well known Criminal Organization with 48 unaccountable private corporations all designed for plausible dependability. If one worker or society is sprung, the rest claim it was nothing to do with them.
The Responsibility rests on the all the Liberal members of parliament who have sat in silence to the incredible endless complaints of criminal behaviours by Child Protection Workers and lawyers.
They are referred to by senior lawyers as "The Gestapo" a style of secret police that would make Hitler proud. A decade back, when the government brought in registration for social workers, the CAS changed the job description to "Child Protection Worker" to allude the reality that have more power than a cop and more power than god. Watch the Video at www.BlakOut.ca and next time you meet a Child Protection Worker, tell em you watched the Blackout.ca video and ask them how can they work for such a criminal organization. The answer is very obvious. You have to demonstrate a propensity to fabricate, lie cheat and torture parents, to engage in absolute cruelity to be a successful Child Protection Worker If you are really good at abusing others, and show an ability to control and manipulate, threaten and intimidate, you get to be a supervisor at the Corrupt Children's Aid Society. www.StopCas.ca There are unfortunately, many necessary apprehensions at birth. The problem is, that a large number of apprehensions at birth or at other ages, are largely based upon fabricated evidence.
The Unaccountable "society", "decided" that it would "rename" social workers as "Child Protection Workers", a name that implies more power than a police officer and that is exactly what it has done, given absolute power to the some of the most unsuitable personalities one could imagine.
These judges Rubber Stamp any order requested by the CAS.
Ontario Legal Aid is increasingly cancelling legal aid certificates which directly assists the corrupt CAS in gaining orders that they would be unlikely to obtain if the party was properly represented. What makes it disgusting is that the CAS Lawyers fabricate evidence directly. If that's not enough, Former CAS lawyers who are the judge, get to kick the victims in the head by fabricating their own conclusions that often don't have any connection with the evidence.
Child Protection Workers the world over, frequently but not always, abuse absolute power and fabricate evidence. The rate of that abuse varies but in Ontario, it reaches a significant number of cases and the odds rise dramatically when it comes to "baby snatching" removing a child at birth. All to often, a pregnant mother will have one or more children removed while she is pregnant, the removal destroys her income and more often than not, the depression resulting from the unnecessary baby-snatching, triggers workers and "Quacks", "hired pens" to write psychological reports that include sufficient exaggerations and omissions to justify "snatching" the next child at birth. Its a big business, Ontario spends One Billion Dollars a year, the Children's Aid Society of Ottawa gets around $80 Million dollars to fund 400 odd employees and the most lucrative jobs require fabrication of evidence to keep the production line running. What is most disgusting is the "make work" projects, that these
corrupt criminal cults have to justify their own existence. They are generally a collection of some of the nastiest personalities
one could ever encounter. The incredible abuses that are perpetuated upon parents and children are beyond the comprehension of the average person.
|